Skip to main content
605Buzz

About 605Buzz

605Buzz publishes South Dakota public records as news. When a company files a layoff notice with the state, when Sioux Falls issues a commercial building permit, when a city council posts an agenda — this site turns that record into a plain-English article, usually within hours, and links back to the record it came from.

Seventeen desks publish today. ten of them read a government record; seven read somebody's own published calendar or listing, and those articles say so rather than asserting an event will happen.

Who runs it

One person: Jason Comes. There is no newsroom, no editorial board, and no other staff. That is the single most important thing to know about this site, because it explains the section below.

Hiring an editor is the intent, and it has not happened. Until it does, nothing on this site should be read as having been checked by a journalist.

How the articles are written

A program fetches the public record and pulls out the fields, then writes the article from them. No editor reads them before they publish. They go live automatically.

Between Aug. 9 and Aug. 18, 2026 a language model edited 37 articles for length and order after the templates had written them. That has been withdrawn. Those 37 are listed at /edited. That pipeline handed a model the article and published the prose it returned, and what came back could not be checked closely enough to keep.

A language model shortens some articles by choosing whole sentences to delete. It is shown the article's sentences, each with a number, and replies with the numbers to cut — it cannot write, rephrase, reorder or add anything, so every word you read is the word the template wrote. Sentences carrying a caveat, an attribution or the link to the source cannot be cut at all. A person asks for each one and approves the result before it publishes; no unattended job edits an article.

While it ran, this page said a program checked that the model added no fact and removed none. The program was real and it did refuse most drafts, but it was weaker than that sentence: it compared tokens rather than claims, so it could not see a figure recombined from digits already in the article, a number reattached to something else, or a name removed. We withdrew the feature rather than keep describing it that way, and each of the 37 keeps the template's own text in its version history — but only for the 10 that were edited AFTER first publication. The other 27 were edited before, so no earlier version exists to compare against. No person reviewed either version.

That is why every one of those articles carries the byline “605Buzz automated newsroom, from public records” and the line “Published automatically from public-record data — not yet reviewed by an editor.” The byline is not a person, and it does not pretend to be one.

The upside is speed and consistency: a template does not get bored, does not skip a small filing, and does not editorialize. The downside is that a template cannot tell you whether a record is surprising, cannot call anyone for comment, and cannot notice that the source itself is wrong. It reports what the record says.

What this site does not do

Where the records come from

Every desk names its source, and every article links back to the record it was built from:

These are public records and published calendars. This site does not buy data, does not scrape private accounts, and does not track you to assemble any of it.

When we get something wrong

Tell us and we will fix it. Every correction is published — with what changed, when, and why — in a public ledger at /corrections, and each article keeps its full version history. Articles are never quietly edited: a corrected article gains a new version, and a withdrawn article serves a permanent tombstone pointing at the correction rather than vanishing.

If an article names you or your business and something in it is wrong, write to corrections@605buzz.com. Say which article and which fact; you do not need to be a lawyer about it. How we handle trust explains what the site can and cannot prove about its own record.

Contact

Corrections: corrections@605buzz.com
Everything else — questions, tips, partnerships, legal, and privacy requests: hello@605buzz.com

Both addresses reach the same person, because there is only one person, so a reply can take a few days.

Inbound email is not receiving yet. Mail routing for 605buzz.com has not been provisioned, so a message sent to any address on this page will currently bounce back to you rather than reach anyone. This is a gap on our side, not a filter — we would rather tell you that than let you assume you were ignored. Until it is fixed, the reliable way to flag a problem with an article is the corrections page, which explains what we record and what a correction request needs to contain, so it can be filed the moment the mailbox is live.